Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770009›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in a Chinese population with severe asthma: a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Ruchong Chen, Liping Wei, Yuanrong Dai, Zaiyi Wang, Danrong Yang, Meiling Jin, Cui Xiong, Ting Li, Shuling Hu, Jie Song and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03562195 (A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03562195 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2018 to 2022Enrolled300ConditionsAsthmaArmsMepolizumab 100 milligrams, Placebo, Salbutamol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Real-world impact of mepolizumab on pediatric and adolescent patients with severe asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruchong ChenState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-8230
Liping WeiThe 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanrong DaiThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zaiyi WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Danrong YangShanghai 6th People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Meiling JinZhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cui XiongR&D, GSK, Shanghai, China.
Ting LiR&D, GSK, Shanghai, China.
Shuling HuR&D, GSK, Shanghai, China.
Jie SongR&D, GSK, Shanghai, China.
Robert ChanClinical Sciences Respiratory, R&D, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Subramanya KumarSafety Evaluation and Risk Management, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Azza AbdelkarimSafety Evaluation and Risk Management, GSK, Warsaw, Poland.
Nanshan ZhongState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In China, the prevalence of severe asthma with eosinophilic phenotype is rising, yet treatment options are limited. Mepolizumab is the first targeted biologic therapy for eosinophilic-driven disease in China. This study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03562195) evaluated efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma. Methods: The phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with severe asthma, with two or more exacerbations in the previous year, and on inhaled corticosteroids plus at least one controller medication. Following a 1-4-week run-in, patients were randomised 1:1 to mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary end-point was annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs) through week 52. Secondary end-points were time to first CSE, frequency of CSEs requiring hospitalisation/emergency department visits or hospitalisation over 52 weeks, mean change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: The modified intention-to-treat population included 300 patients. At week 52 with mepolizumab Conclusion: Mepolizumab provided clinical benefits to patients with severe asthma in China and showed a favourable benefit-risk profile.

Identifiers

PMID38770009
PMCPMC11103715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.