ArticleERJ open research2024
Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in a Chinese population with severe asthma: a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03562195 (A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Add-on mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma on medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of IL-4Rα and IL-5/IL-5R Targeted Biologic Therapies in Type 2 Inflammatory Airway Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world impact of mepolizumab on pediatric and adolescent patients with severe asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of mepolizumab among patients with severe asthma from the Chinese societal perspective.PloS one · 2026Article
- Clinical Remission Outcome in Chinese Patients With Severe Asthma With an Eosinophilic Phenotype Receiving Mepolizumab: AAllergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- The management of type 2 inflammatory respiratory diseases: a Chinese expert consensus [2024].Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Mepolizumab in Severe Pediatric Asthma: Certainties and Doubts through a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In China, the prevalence of severe asthma with eosinophilic phenotype is rising, yet treatment options are limited. Mepolizumab is the first targeted biologic therapy for eosinophilic-driven disease in China. This study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03562195) evaluated efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma. Methods: The phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with severe asthma, with two or more exacerbations in the previous year, and on inhaled corticosteroids plus at least one controller medication. Following a 1-4-week run-in, patients were randomised 1:1 to mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary end-point was annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs) through week 52. Secondary end-points were time to first CSE, frequency of CSEs requiring hospitalisation/emergency department visits or hospitalisation over 52 weeks, mean change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: The modified intention-to-treat population included 300 patients. At week 52 with mepolizumab Conclusion: Mepolizumab provided clinical benefits to patients with severe asthma in China and showed a favourable benefit-risk profile.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.