Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770005›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of stool-based testing for childhood tuberculosis.

Bazezew Yenew, Petra de Haas, Yohannes Babo, Getu Diriba, Bihil Sherefdin, Ahmed Bedru, Ben Tegegn, Tilaye Gudina, Tadesse Getahun, Saro Abdella and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stool Processing Methods for Xpert Ultra Testing in Childhood Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Multicountry Accuracy Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stool XpertIJTLD open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bazezew YenewEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-7000
Petra de HaasKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Yohannes BaboKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getu DiribaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bihil SherefdinKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ahmed BedruKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ben TegegnAddis Ababa City Health Bureau, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tilaye GudinaNational Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Program of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tadesse GetahunYekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saro AbdellaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Degu JereneKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Eveline KlinkenbergKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Edine TiemersmaKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-3038
ASTTIE study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis remains challenging, partly because children cannot provide sputum. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Simple One-Step (SOS) stool method with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) for childhood TB compared to culture and Xpert-Ultra on a respiratory sample (RS) and clinical diagnosis. It also assessed the feasibility and acceptability of stool testing according to laboratory staff, and caregivers' sample preference. Methods: We enrolled children (≤10 years) with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in Ethiopia. RS was tested using Xpert-Ultra and culture; stool samples were tested using the SOS stool method with Xpert-Ultra. Laboratory staff and caregivers' opinions were assessed using standardised questionnaires. Results: Of the 898 children enrolled, 792, 832 and 794 were included for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra against culture, RS Xpert-Ultra and clinical diagnosis, respectively, yielding sensitivity estimates for SOS stool with Xpert-Ultra of 69.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.0-79.7%), 76.8% (95% CI 64.2-85.9%) and 59.0% (95% CI 47.9-69.2%), respectively. The specificity was ≥98.8% for all comparisons. The rate of non-determinate test results was 2.8% after one repeat test. According to laboratory staff, stool collection was feasible and acceptable and the SOS stool method was easy to perform. Most caregivers (75%) preferred stool for TB diagnosis over RS. Conclusion: This study shows that SOS stool Xpert-Ultra testing offers a good alternative to RS testing for TB in children who cannot spontaneously produce a sputum sample and would otherwise need to undergo invasive procedures to obtain RS for diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID38770005
PMCPMC11103712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.