ArticleRSC advances2024
Characterization of key aroma compounds of fried pepper sauce under different pretreatment processes.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between volatile flavour compounds and microbial communities during the fermentation of traditional mould-fermented Sufu.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Integrating gene knockout, GC-O-MS and multivariate statistical analysis: revealing the impact ofRSC advances · 2025Article
- Impact of different drying methods on the quality and flavor of two chili peppers (Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fried pepper sauce (FPS) is renowned among consumers for its distinct aroma profile and rich nutritional composition. However, the primary aroma components of FPSs, crucial for quality assurance, remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to delve deeper into the unique aroma profile of FPSs by analyzing samples subjected to various pretreatment methods (including three heat-moisture treatment processes: soaking at 60 °C, soaking at 100 °C, and steaming, and three crushing processes: mashing, mincing, and horizontal knife cutting). FPS samples were analyzed by quantitative descriptive sensory analysis (QDA), gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS), relative odor activity value analysis (rOAV), principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and partial least squares regression analysis (PLSR). The QDA results revealed that the overall aroma profile of FPS products was characterized by chili-like, fatty, and herbal notes. GC-MS identified 115 volatile components in FPSs, primarily alkenes, ketones, and acids, with varying concentrations across samples. According to the rOAV (>1) and GC-O, 11 compounds were identified as key aroma contributors to FPS aroma, including 2-methylpropanal, acetic acid, 3-methylbutanal, methional, eucalyptol, benzeneacetaldehyde, linalool, (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.