Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769867›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.

Holly Chung, Amelia Hyatt, Kate Webber, Suzanne Kosmider, Meinir Krishnasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly ChungAcademic Nursing Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Amelia HyattDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2322-7817
Kate WebberOncology Department, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Suzanne KosmiderCancer Services, Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
Meinir KrishnasamyAcademic Nursing Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Victorian Government Department of Health Cancer Support, Treatment and Research Unit
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite significant advances in the management of lung cancer, patients continue to experience a high burden of unmet need impacting quality of life and outcomes of care. Achieving value-based health care, where investment is targeted to services that deliver optimal experience and outcomes of care relative to the cost of delivering that care, requires attention to what people value most in meeting their needs. To date there has been little attention to what matters most to patients with lung cancer (i.e., what they value) as a component of achieving value-based cancer care. This qualitative study was undertaken to investigate components of care valued by people with lung cancer in Australia.

methodsThis qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 23 people with lung cancer. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy from two metropolitan tertiary public health services. Data collected included demographic characteristics and patient perspectives regarding their priority concerns and components of care identified as most valuable in meeting their needs. Demographic characteristics of participants were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically using Interpretive Description.

resultsData analysis generated three key themes: valued components of care; benefits of receiving valued care components and consequences of missed opportunities for care. The components of care valued by patients reflect the core dimensions of cancer supportive care, with particular emphasis on ongoing opportunities for consultation (screening for unmet needs) and provision of person-centred information. The facilitation of trust between patients and their treating team, as a consequence of having these valued components evident in their care, was identified as a key characteristic of value-based care.

conclusionsThis study has identified valued components of care described by people with lung cancer. Importantly, the care components identified have been proven to improve access to and coordination of care, and demonstrate the importance of integrating supportive care into care provision to achieve value-based cancer care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was informed by perspectives of lung cancer patients who participated in semistructured interviews. We acknowledge that this contribution does not meet the criteria for patient and public involvement in research as defined by Health Expectations, but this study forms part of a larger program of cancer supportive care work being undertaken by this team, where comprehensive consumer engagement and co-design approaches are embedded in our work.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicLung NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Lifecancer supportive carelung cancerpatient perspectivequalitativevalue‐based care

Identifiers

PMID38769867
PMCPMC11106590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.