Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769619›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of paediatric dentistry2025

Novel AI-based tool for primary tooth segmentation on CBCT using convolutional neural networks: A validation study.

Sara Elsonbaty, Bahaaeldeen M Elgarba, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Abdullah Swaity, Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara ElsonbatyOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0175-2642
Bahaaeldeen M ElgarbaOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-6567
Rocharles Cavalcante FonteneleOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-9768
Abdullah SwaityOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4623-8290
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-0363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary teeth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans is essential for paediatric treatment planning. Conventional methods, however, are time-consuming and necessitate advanced expertise.

aimThe aim of this study was to validate an artificial intelligence (AI) cloud-based platform for automated segmentation (AS) of primary teeth on CBCT. Its accuracy, time efficiency, and consistency were compared with manual segmentation (MS).

designA dataset comprising 402 primary teeth (37 CBCT scans) was retrospectively retrieved from two CBCT devices. Primary teeth were manually segmented using a cloud-based platform representing the ground truth, whereas AS was performed on the same platform. To assess the AI tool's performance, voxel- and surface-based metrics were employed to compare MS and AS methods. Additionally, segmentation time was recorded for each method, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed consistency between them.

resultsAS revealed high performance in segmenting primary teeth with high accuracy (98 ± 1%) and dice similarity coefficient (DSC; 95 ± 2%). Moreover, it was 35 times faster than the manual approach with an average time of 24 s. Both MS and AS demonstrated excellent consistency (ICC = 0.99 and 1, respectively).

conclusionThe platform demonstrated expert-level accuracy, and time-efficient and consistent segmentation of primary teeth on CBCT scans, serving treatment planning in children.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyNeural Networks, ComputerTooth, DeciduousChildHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceCBCTcone beam computed tomographyconvolutional neural networksdeep learningmilk teethprimary tooth

Identifiers

PMID38769619
PMCPMC11626492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.