Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769564›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2024

Towards proactive palliative care in oncology: developing an explainable EHR-based machine learning model for mortality risk prediction.

Qingyuan Zhuang, Alwin Yaoxian Zhang, Ryan Shea Tan Ying Cong, Grace Meijuan Yang, Patricia Soek Hui Neo, Daniel Sw Tan, Melvin Lk Chua, Iain Beehuat Tan, Fuh Yong Wong, Marcus Eng Hock Ong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the assessment model for palliative care needs in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Updates on strategies to integrate palliative care in hematologic malignancy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qingyuan ZhuangDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore. zhuang.qingyuan@singhealth.com.sg.
Alwin Yaoxian ZhangDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Ryan Shea Tan Ying CongDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Grace Meijuan YangDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Patricia Soek Hui NeoDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
Daniel Sw TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Melvin Lk ChuaData Computational Science Core, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Iain Beehuat TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Fuh Yong WongDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngHealth Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore.
Sean Shao Wei LamHealth Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore.
Nan LiuCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Lien Centre for Palliative Care LCPC-EX20-0003National Medical Research Council Research Training Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEx-ante identification of the last year in life facilitates a proactive palliative approach. Machine learning models trained on electronic health records (EHR) demonstrate promising performance in cancer prognostication. However, gaps in literature include incomplete reporting of model performance, inadequate alignment of model formulation with implementation use-case, and insufficient explainability hindering trust and adoption in clinical settings. Hence, we aim to develop an explainable machine learning EHR-based model that prompts palliative care processes by predicting for 365-day mortality risk among patients with advanced cancer within an outpatient setting.

methodsOur cohort consisted of 5,926 adults diagnosed with Stage 3 or 4 solid organ cancer between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020 and receiving ambulatory cancer care within a tertiary center. The classification problem was modelled using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and aligned to our envisioned use-case: "Given a prediction point that corresponds to an outpatient cancer encounter, predict for mortality within 365-days from prediction point, using EHR data up to 365-days prior." The model was trained with 75% of the dataset (n = 39,416 outpatient encounters) and validated on a 25% hold-out dataset (n = 13,122 outpatient encounters). To explain model outputs, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. Clinical characteristics, laboratory tests and treatment data were used to train the model. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), while model calibration was assessed using the Brier score.

resultsIn total, 17,149 of the 52,538 prediction points (32.6%) had a mortality event within the 365-day prediction window. The model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.861 (95% CI 0.856-0.867) and AUPRC of 0.771. The Brier score was 0.147, indicating slight overestimations of mortality risk. Explanatory diagrams utilizing SHAP values allowed visualization of feature impacts on predictions at both the global and individual levels.

conclusionOur machine learning model demonstrated good discrimination and precision-recall in predicting 365-day mortality risk among individuals with advanced cancer. It has the potential to provide personalized mortality predictions and facilitate earlier integration of palliative care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningPalliative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedMortalityNeoplasmsRisk AssessmentClinical decision support systemsElectronic Health RecordsMachine learningOncologyPalliative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID38769564
PMCPMC11103848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.