ArticleBMC biology2024
Exonuclease editor promotes precision of gene editing in mammalian cells.
Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany efforts have been made to improve the precision of Cas9-mediated gene editing through increasing knock-in efficiency and decreasing byproducts, which proved to be challenging.
resultsHere, we have developed a human exonuclease 1-based genome-editing tool, referred to as exonuclease editor. When compared to Cas9, the exonuclease editor gave rise to increased HDR efficiency, reduced NHEJ repair frequency, and significantly elevated HDR/indel ratio. Robust gene editing precision of exonuclease editor was even superior to the fusion of Cas9 with E1B or DN1S, two previously reported precision-enhancing domains. Notably, exonuclease editor inhibited NHEJ at double strand breaks locally rather than globally, reducing indel frequency without compromising genome integrity. The replacement of Cas9 with single-strand DNA break-creating Cas9 nickase further increased the HDR/indel ratio by 453-fold than the original Cas9. In addition, exonuclease editor resulted in high microhomology-mediated end joining efficiency, allowing accurate and flexible deletion of targeted sequences with extended lengths with the aid of paired sgRNAs. Exonuclease editor was further used for correction of DMD patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells, where 30.0% of colonies were repaired by HDR versus 11.1% in the control.
conclusionsTherefore, the exonuclease editor system provides a versatile and safe genome editing tool with high precision and holds promise for therapeutic gene correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.