Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769427›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predictive modelling and identification of key risk factors for stroke using machine learning.

Ahmad Hassan, Saima Gulzar Ahmad, Ehsan Ullah Munir, Imtiaz Ali Khan, Naeem Ramzan

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repeated Health Screening Measures and Incident Ischemic Stroke: Evidence From a Korean Population Study.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence and stroke imaging.Current opinion in neurology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad HassanDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Grand Trunk Road, Wah, 47010, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-712X
Saima Gulzar AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Grand Trunk Road, Wah, 47010, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-0570
Ehsan Ullah MunirDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Grand Trunk Road, Wah, 47010, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7838-0291
Imtiaz Ali KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Cardiff School of Technologies, Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-1319
Naeem RamzanSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK. naeem.ramzan@uws.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-1462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strokes are a leading global cause of mortality, underscoring the need for early detection and prevention strategies. However, addressing hidden risk factors and achieving accurate prediction become particularly challenging in the presence of imbalanced and missing data. This study encompasses three imputation techniques to deal with missing data. To tackle data imbalance, it employs the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). The study initiates with a baseline model and subsequently employs an extensive range of advanced models. This study thoroughly evaluates the performance of these models by employing k-fold cross-validation on various imbalanced and balanced datasets. The findings reveal that age, body mass index (BMI), average glucose level, heart disease, hypertension, and marital status are the most influential features in predicting strokes. Furthermore, a Dense Stacking Ensemble (DSE) model is built upon previous advanced models after fine-tuning, with the best-performing model as a meta-classifier. The DSE model demonstrated over 96% accuracy across diverse datasets, with an AUC score of 83.94% on imbalanced imputed dataset and 98.92% on balanced one. This research underscores the remarkable performance of the DSE model, compared to the previous research on the same dataset. It highlights the model's potential for early stroke detection to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStrokeAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38769427
PMCPMC11106277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.