Trial reportPediatric research2024
Robot-assisted gait training improves walking and cerebral connectivity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Trial report in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04246788 (Intensive Robotic Rehabilitation in Children With Hemiparesia Using GEOSYSTEM), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intensive Robotic Rehabilitation in Children With Hemiparesia Using GEOSYSTEM
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Optimal exercise dose and training modalities for improving gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of emerging technology-assisted rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced motor recovery in stroke patients through dual-modal intervention: motor imagery and task-oriented robot training.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is promising to help walking rehabilitation in cerebral palsy, but training-induced neuroplastic effects have little been investigated.
methodsForty unilateral cerebral palsy children aged 4-18 years were randomly allocated in a monocentric study to ten 20-minute RAGT sessions with the G-EO system, five days a week (n = 20) or to a control group (who continued conventional care with six 30-minute physiotherapy sessions, three days a week) (n = 20), two weeks running, from September 2020 to December 2021. Clinical and MRI outcomes were compared before and one month after therapy. The primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were a 6-minute walking test distance, Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) dimensions D and E, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, resting-state functional connectivity within the sensorimotor network, and structural connectivity in the corticospinal tracts.
resultsGait speed and the 6-minute walking test distance improved more after RAGT. Resting-state functional connectivity increased after RAGT but decreased in controls between superior and lateral healthy or lateral injured sensorimotor networks. GMFM-88 and structural connectivity in corticospinal tracts were unchanged. Impression of improvement in children was better after RAGT.
conclusionShort-term benefit of repetitive RAGT on walking abilities and functional cerebral connectivity was found in unilateral cerebral palsy children. IMPACT STATEMENT: Short-term repetitive robot-assisted gait training improves gait speed and walking resistance and increases cerebral functional connectivity in unilateral cerebral palsy. GMFM dimensions D and E were unchanged after short-term repetitive robot-assisted gait training in unilateral cerebral palsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38769400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.