SynthesisPediatric research2025
Prevalence of hearing impairment in neonatal encephalopathy due to hypoxia-ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: Hearing Impairment and Related Risk Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of Dystocia Duration on the Placental Health in Canines.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Therapies for Consequences of Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: Where Are We Now?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review was undertaken to estimate the overall prevalence of hearing impairment in survivors of neonatal HIE.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, EMCARE and Cochrane databases, mednar (gray literature) were searched till January 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. The main outcome was estimation of overall prevalence of hearing impairment in survivors of HIE.
resultsA total of 71studies (5821 infants assessed for hearing impairment) were included of which 56 were from high income countries (HIC) and 15 from low- or middle-income countries (LMIC). Overall prevalence rate of hearing impairment in cooled infants was 5% (95% CI: 3-6%, n = 4868) and 3% (95% CI: 1-6%, n = 953) in non-cooled HIE infants. The prevalence rate in cooled HIE infants in LMICs was 7% (95% CI: 2-15%) and in HICs was 4% (95% CI: 3-5%). The prevalence rate in non-cooled HIE infants in LMICs was 8% (95% CI: 2-17%) and HICs was 2% (95% CI: 0-4%).
conclusionsThese results would be useful for counseling parents, and in acting as benchmark when comparing institutional data, and while monitoring future RCTs testing new interventions in HIE. There is a need for more data from LMICs and standardization of reporting hearing impairment. IMPACT: The overall prevalence rate of hearing impairment in cooled infants with HIE was 5% (95% CI: 3-6%) and 3% (95% CI: 1-6%) in the non-cooled infants. The prevalence rate in cooled HIE infants in LMICs was 7% (95% CI: 2-15%) and in HICs was 4% (95% CI: 3-5%). The prevalence rate in non-cooled HIE infants in LMICs was 8% (95% CI: 2-17%) and HICs was 2% (95% CI: 0-4%). These results would be useful for counseling parents, and in acting as benchmark when comparing institutional data, and while monitoring future RCTs testing new interventions in HIE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.