Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769365›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison between contact diode laser with 980 nm and 1470 nm wavelengths for posterior laryngofissure in pigs.

Isaac de Faria Soares Rodrigues, Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso, Natalia Aparecida Nepomuceno da Silva, Aristides Tadeu Correia, Helio Minamoto, Benoit Jacques Bibas, Natalia de Souza Xavier Costa, Marilia Wellichan Mancini, Marisa Dolhnikoff, Paulo Manuel Pego-Fernandes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isaac de Faria Soares RodriguesThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. isaac.rodrigues@edu.famerp.br.
Paulo Francisco Guerreiro CardosoThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Natalia Aparecida Nepomuceno da SilvaThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aristides Tadeu CorreiaThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Helio MinamotoThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Benoit Jacques BibasThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Natalia de Souza Xavier CostaDepartament of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marilia Wellichan ManciniDepartment of Biophotonics, Institute of Research and Education in the Health Area (NUPEN), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Marisa DolhnikoffDepartament of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Manuel Pego-FernandesThoracic Surgery Research Laboratory (LIM-61), Division of Thoracic Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare two different wavelengths of the surgical contact diode laser (CDL) for producing a posterior laryngofissure in in-vivo pigs. Anesthetized pigs underwent a tracheostomy and an anterior laryngofissure through a cervicotomy. They were randomly selected for the CDL wavelength and Power, according to the peak of Power set at device (980nm wavelength: Ppeak power of 10 W, 15 W, and 20 W, or 1470 nm wavelength: Ppeak 3 W, 5 W, 7 W, 10 W). At the end of the experiment, the laryngotracheal specimen was extracted and sent for histology and morphometry measurements (incision size, depth, area, and lateral thermal damage). Hemodynamic data and arterial blood gases were recorded during the incisions. Statistical analysis of the comparisons between the parameters and groups had a level of significance of p < 0.05. Twenty-six pigs were divided into CDL 980 nm (n = 11) and 1470 nm (n = 15). There was a greater incision area at the thyroid level in the 980 nm CDL and a wider incision at the trachea level, with a larger distance between mucosa borders. There were no significant differences in the area of lateral thermal damage between the two groups and neither difference among the power levels tested. Both wavelengths tested showed similar results in the various combinations of power levels without significant differences in the lateral thermal damage. The posterior laryngofissure incision can be performed by either of the wavelengths at low and medium power levels without great difference on lateral thermal damage.

Indexed as

LarynxLasers, SemiconductorAnimalsLaser TherapySwineTrachea

Identifiers

PMID38769365
PMCPMC11106238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.