Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769362›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Nudge-based misinformation interventions are effective in information environments with low misinformation prevalence.

Lucy H Butler, Toby Prike, Ullrich K H Ecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy H ButlerSchool of Psychological Science (M304), University of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia. l.butler@northeastern.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5480-8716
Toby PrikeSchool of Psychological Science (M304), University of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7602-4947
Ullrich K H EckerSchool of Psychological Science (M304), University of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-313X

Funding

Australian Research Council FT190100708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nudge-based misinformation interventions are presented as cheap and effective ways to reduce the spread of misinformation online. However, despite online information environments typically containing relatively low volumes of misinformation, most studies testing the effectiveness of nudge interventions present equal proportions of true and false information. As the effectiveness of nudges can be highly context-dependent, it is imperative to validate the effectiveness of nudge-based interventions in environments with more realistic proportions of misinformation. The current study (N = 1387) assessed the effectiveness of a combined accuracy and social-norm nudge in simulated social-media environments with varying proportions of misinformation (50%, 20%, and 12.5%) relative to true and non-news-based (i.e., "social") information. The nudge intervention was effective at improving sharing discernment in conditions with lower proportions of misinformation, providing ecologically valid support for the use of nudge-based interventions to counter misinformation propagation on social media.

Indexed as

CommunicationSocial MediaAdultFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMaleSocial NormsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38769362
PMCPMC11106285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.