SynthesisArchives of toxicology2024
Neurotoxicity of crack cocaine exposure: evidence from a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies.
Synthesis in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cannabidiol as a treatment for cocaine use disorder: a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies suggest that crack cocaine users exhibit higher prevalence of both psychiatric and psychosocial problems, with an aggressive pattern of drug use. Nevertheless, few experimental studies attempted to verify the neurotoxicity after crack cocaine exposure, especially when compared with other routes of cocaine administration. This systematic review aimed to verify whether in vitro and/or in vivo crack cocaine exposure is more neurotoxic than cocaine exposure (snorted or injected). A search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS databases for in vitro and in vivo toxicological studies conducted with either rats or mice, with no distinction with regard to sex or age. Other methods including BioRxiv, BDTD, Academic Google, citation searching, and specialist consultation were also adopted. Two independent investigators screened the titles and abstracts of retrieved studies and subsequently performed full-text reading and data extraction. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Toxicological data Reliability assessment Tool (ToxRTool). The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022332250). Of the twelve studies included, three were in vitro and nine were in vivo studies. According to the ToxRTool, most studies were considered reliable either with or without restrictions, with no one being considered as not reliable. The studies found neuroteratogenic effects, decreased threshold for epileptic seizures, schizophrenic-like symptoms, and cognitive deficits to be associated with crack cocaine exposure. Moreover, both in vitro and in vivo studies reported a worsening in cocaine neurotoxic effect caused by the anhydroecgonine methyl ester (AEME), a cocaine main pyrolysis product, which is in line with the more aggressive pattern of crack cocaine use. This systematic review suggests that crack cocaine exposure is more neurotoxic than other routes of cocaine administration. However, before the scarcity of studies on this topic, further toxicological studies are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38769171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.