ReviewNature protocols2024
An MSstats workflow for detecting differentially abundant proteins in large-scale data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry experiments with FragPipe processing.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardized Annotation of Quantitative Proteomics Datasets Using SDRF-Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Ultrahigh-Throughput Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Targeted Protein Degradation Compound Screening Using the Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- AI-enabled virtual immunopeptidomics links quantitative neoantigen presentation to immunogenicity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Decoding disease and therapy through multiomics integration and systems analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A class of deep intronicmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- miR-34 regulates stress-induced depression-like state through theResearch square · 2026Article
- What Does Next-Generation Mass Spectrometry Offer for Proteomics? A Comprehensive Platform Comparison.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Frag'n'Flow: automated workflow for large-scale quantitative proteomics in high performance computing environments.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advances in mass spectrometry and proteomics have made it possible to perform larger-scale and more-complex experiments. The volume and complexity of the resulting data create major challenges for downstream analysis. In particular, next-generation data-independent acquisition (DIA) experiments enable wider proteome coverage than more traditional targeted approaches but require computational workflows that can manage much larger datasets and identify peptide sequences from complex and overlapping spectral features. Data-processing tools such as FragPipe, DIA-NN and Spectronaut have undergone substantial improvements to process spectral features in a reasonable time. Statistical analysis tools are needed to draw meaningful comparisons between experimental samples, but these tools were also originally designed with smaller datasets in mind. This protocol describes an updated version of MSstats that has been adapted to be compatible with large-scale DIA experiments. A very large DIA experiment, processed with FragPipe, is used as an example to demonstrate different MSstats workflows. The choice of workflow depends on the user's computational resources. For datasets that are too large to fit into a standard computer's memory, we demonstrate the use of MSstatsBig, a companion R package to MSstats. The protocol also highlights key decisions that have a major effect on both the results and the processing time of the analysis. The MSstats processing can be expected to take 1-3 h depending on the usage of MSstatsBig. The protocol can be run in the point-and-click graphical user interface MSstatsShiny or implemented with minimal coding expertise in R.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38769142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.