Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38769048›Full record

SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2024

Comparative efficacy of volume expansion, inotropes and vasopressors in preterm neonates with probable transitional circulatory instability in the first week of life: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Viraraghavan V Ramaswamy, Gunjana Kumar, Pullattayil Abdul Kareem, Abhishek Somasekhara Aradhya, Pradeep Suryawanshi, Mohit Sahni, Supreet Khurana, Deepak Sharma, Kiran More, National Neonatal Forum, India; Clinical Practice Guidelines Group 2023

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Viraraghavan V RamaswamyNeonatology, Ankura Hospital for Women & Children, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-3597
Gunjana KumarNeonatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Pullattayil Abdul KareemMedical library, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6718-5228
Abhishek Somasekhara AradhyaPediatrics, Ovum Woman and Child Speciality Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-0939
Pradeep SuryawanshiNeonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College & Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-2041
Mohit SahniNeonatology, Surat Kids Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Supreet KhuranaNeonatology, GMCH, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-5984
Deepak SharmaNeonatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Kiran MoreNeonatology, MRR Children's Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India drkiranmore@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0002
National Neonatal Forum, India; Clinical Practice Guidelines Group 2023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere exists limited agreement on the recommendations for the treatment of transitional circulatory instability (TCI) in preterm neonates

objectiveTo compare the efficacy of various interventions used to treat TCI

methodsMedline and Embase were searched from inception to 21

interventionsDopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, hydrocortisone, vasopressin, milrinone, volume and placebo.

main outcome measuresMortality, major brain injury (MBI) (intraventricular haemorrhage > grade 2 or cystic periventricular leukomalacia), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) ≥stage 2 and treatment response (as defined by the author).

results15 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included from the 1365 titles and abstracts screened. Clinical benefit or harm could not be ruled out for the critical outcome of mortality. For the outcome of MBI, epinephrine possibly decreased the risk when compared to dobutamine and milrinone (very low certainty). Epinephrine was possibly associated with a lesser risk of NEC when compared with dopamine, dobutamine, hydrocortisone and milrinone (very low certainty). Dopamine was possibly associated with a lesser risk of NEC when compared with dobutamine (very low certainty). Vasopressin possibly decreased the risk of NEC compared with dopamine, dobutamine, hydrocortisone and milrinone (very low certainty). Clinical benefit or harm could not be ruled out for the outcome response to treatment.

conclusionsEpinephrine may be used as the first-line drug in preterm neonates with TCI, the evidence certainty being very low. We suggest future trials evaluating the management of TCI with an emphasis on objective criteria to define it.

Indexed as

Cardiotonic AgentsInfant, PrematureVasoconstrictor AgentsDobutamineHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiotonic AgentsDobutamineVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiologyInfantLow and Middle Income CountriesNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID38769048
PMCPMC11110579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.