Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768995›Full record

ArticleBMJ leader2025

Content analysis of succession planning in nursing management: a qualitative study.

Mansoureh Ashghali-Farahani, Tahmine Salehi, Mohammadsaeed Mirzaee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ leader, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Next in Line: Building a Succession Pipeline for Advanced Practitioners in Oncology.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mansoureh Ashghali-FarahaniSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tahmine SalehiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadsaeed MirzaeeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran saeedmirzaee75@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0372-1383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe identification and development of managerial talents for nursing manager succession in the future should be a concern for organisations, as the concept of succession planning has not been seriously addressed in nursing. This study aimed to explore managers' perceptions of the concept of succession planning in nursing management.

designThis qualitative study used a conventional content analysis approach.

methodsParticipants included 15 nursing managers, who were purposively selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After obtaining ethical approval, data were collected through semistructured interviews. MAXQDA software was used for data management, and data analysis was performed using the seven-stage method by Graneheim and Lundman. The credibility and dependability of the data were assessed using Guba and Lincoln's criteria.

resultsThe main categories identified in this study were barriers to succession planning, facilitators, succession planning requirements, contextualisation, succession planning cycle, the dynamism of the successor organisation and consequences of lack of succession planning. Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that organisations plan and adopt policies to develop qualified personnel management in nursing organisations and appoint these individuals to critical managerial positions.

Indexed as

LeadershipNurse AdministratorsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchhealthcare planningmanagementsuccession planningtotal quality management

Identifiers

PMID38768995
PMCPMC12038118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.