Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768202›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Not your private tête-à-tête: leveraging the power of higher-order networks to study animal communication.

Iacopo Iacopini, Jennifer R Foote, Nina H Fefferman, Elizabeth P Derryberry, Matthew J Silk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Not your private tête-à-tête: leveraging the power of higher-order networks to study animal communication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iacopo IacopiniNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University London , London, E1W 1LP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-6410
Jennifer R FooteDepartment of Biology, Algoma University , Marie, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-3496
Nina H FeffermanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0233-1404
Elizabeth P DerryberryDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-9748
Matthew J SilkCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD , Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-5383

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 101023948James S. McDonnell FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal Society URF\R1\221800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal communication is frequently studied with conventional network representations that link pairs of individuals who interact, for example, through vocalization. However, acoustic signals often have multiple simultaneous receivers, or receivers integrate information from multiple signallers, meaning these interactions are not dyadic. Additionally, non-dyadic social structures often shape an individual's behavioural response to vocal communication. Recently, major advances have been made in the study of these non-dyadic, higher-order networks (e.g. hypergraphs and simplicial complexes). Here, we show how these approaches can provide new insights into vocal communication through three case studies that illustrate how higher-order network models can: (i) alter predictions made about the outcome of vocally coordinated group departures; (ii) generate different patterns of song synchronization from models that only include dyadic interactions; and (iii) inform models of cultural evolution of vocal communication. Together, our examples highlight the potential power of higher-order networks to study animal vocal communication. We then build on our case studies to identify key challenges in applying higher-order network approaches in this context and outline important research questions that these techniques could help answer. This article is part of the theme issue 'The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics'.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAnimal CommunicationAnimalsModels, BiologicalSocial Behaviorchorushypergraph, simplicial complexquorum decision makingsocial networkssynchronization

Identifiers

PMID38768202
PMCPMC11391305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.