Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768199›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.

Chun-Chieh Liao, Robert D Magrath, Marta B Manser, Damien R Farine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the Role of Vocal Plasticity in Sociospatial Coordination.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. The socioecological correlates of collective movements in giraffes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chun-Chieh LiaoDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT , 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0803-0234
Robert D MagrathDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT , 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-609X
Marta B ManserDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich , Zürich , 8057, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8787-5667
Damien R FarineDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT , 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-7613

Funding

Australian Research CouncilH2020 European Research CouncilResearch School of Biology, Australian National UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversität Zürich
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To benefit from group living, individuals need to maintain cohesion and coordinate their activities. Effective communication thus becomes critical, facilitating rapid coordination of behaviours and reducing consensus costs when group members have differing needs and information. In many bird and mammal species, collective decisions rely on acoustic signals in some contexts but on movement cues in others. Yet, to date, there is no clear conceptual framework that predicts when decisions should evolve to be based on acoustic signals versus movement cues. Here, we first review how acoustic signals and movement cues are used for coordinating activities. We then outline how information masking, discrimination ability (Weber's Law) and encoding limitations, as well as trade-offs between these, can identify which types of collective behaviours likely rely on acoustic signals or movement cues. Specifically, our framework proposes that behaviours involving the timing of events or expression of specific actions should rely more on acoustic signals, whereas decisions involving complex choices with multiple options (e.g. direction and destination) should generally use movement cues because sounds are more vulnerable to information masking and Weber's Law effects. We then discuss potential future avenues of enquiry, including multimodal communication and collective decision-making by mixed-species animal groups. This article is part of the theme issue 'The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamic'.

Indexed as

CuesDecision MakingAnimal CommunicationAnimalsBirdsMammalsMovementSocial BehaviorVocalization, Animalcollective behaviourgroup cohesionmovementquorumvocal communication

Identifiers

PMID38768199
PMCPMC11391321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.