Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768197›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Exploring the role of vocalizations in regulating group dynamics.

Bing Xie, Josefine B Brask, Torben Dabelsteen, Elodie F Briefer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the Role of Vocal Plasticity in Sociospatial Coordination.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  3. Neural Bases of Collective Social Behavior and Group Interactions across Species.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social vocalizations indicate behavioural type inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Exploring the role of vocalizations in regulating group dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bing XieBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-0703
Josefine B BraskBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-5204
Torben DabelsteenBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-3924
Elodie F BrieferBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-0319

Funding

Carlsbergfondet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the diverging needs of individuals, group life can lead to disputes and competition, but it also has many advantages, such as reduced predation risk, information sharing and increased hunting success. Social animals have to maintain group cohesion and need to synchronize activities, such as foraging, resting, social interactions and movements, in order to thrive in groups. Acoustic signals are highly relevant for social dynamics, some because they are long-ranging and others because they are short-ranging, which may serve important within-group functions. However, although there has been an increase in studies concentrating on acoustic communication within groups in the past decade, many aspects of how vocalizations relate to group dynamics are still poorly understood. The aim of this review is to present an overview of our current knowledge on the role of vocalizations in regulating social group dynamics, identify knowledge gaps and recommend potential future research directions. We review the role that vocalizations play in (i) collective movement, (ii) separation risk and cohesion maintenance, (iii) fission-fusion dynamics, and (iv) social networks. We recommend that future studies aim to increase the diversity of studied species and strengthen the integration of state-of-the-art tools to study social dynamics and acoustic signals. This article is part of the theme issue 'The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics'.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsGroup Dynamicsacoustic communicationcollective movementfission–fusion dynamicsgroup dynamicssocial networksvocal networks

Identifiers

PMID38768197
PMCPMC11391291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.