Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768196›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

In pop pursuit: social bond strength predicts vocal synchrony during cooperative mate guarding in bottlenose dolphins.

Emma Chereskin, Simon J Allen, Richard C Connor, Michael Krützen, Stephanie L King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Cortical Site that Encodes Vocal Expression and Reception.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. In pop pursuit: social bond strength predicts vocal synchrony during cooperative mate guarding in bottlenose dolphins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. The power of sound: unravelling how acoustic communication shapes group dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma ChereskinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-882X
Simon J AllenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-8143
Richard C ConnorBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth , North Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-746X
Michael KrützenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich , Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-5299
Stephanie L KingSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2293-9185

Funding

Branco Weiss Fellowship—Society in ScienceSwiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal communication is an emblematic feature of group-living animals, used to share information and strengthen social bonds. Vocalizations are also used to coordinate group-level behaviours in many taxa, but little is known of the factors that may influence vocal behaviour during cooperative acts. Allied male Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (

Indexed as

Bottle-Nosed DolphinSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsCooperative BehaviorFemaleMalealliancesbottlenose dolphincooperationmate guardingsocial networksvocal synchrony

Identifiers

PMID38768196
PMCPMC11391284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.