Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768190›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Combining species distribution models and big datasets may provide finer assessments of snakebite impacts.

Mohammad Abdul Wahed Chowdhury, Johannes Müller, Aniruddha Ghose, Robed Amin, Abdullah Abu Sayeed, Ulrich Kuch, Mohammad Abul Faiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Abdul Wahed ChowdhuryDepartment of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-0026
Johannes MüllerMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin, Germany.
Aniruddha GhoseVenom Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Robed AminVenom Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Abu SayeedVenom Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Ulrich KuchVenom Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Abul FaizVenom Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebite is a major poverty-related neglected tropical disease. An integrated scientific approach is needed to understand the dynamics of this important health issue. Our objective was to estimate snakebite occurrence in a tropical area by using a blend of ecological modelling and robust statistical analysis.

methodsThe present study used climatic, environmental, and human population density data to determine the area with snakebite occurrence-probability for the first time in Bangladesh. We also analysed a large, 16-year dataset of hospitalized snakebite cases to reveal the epidemiology of snakebite in the south-eastern zone of the country.

findingsOur results show that cobra bite is the most commonly occurring venomous snakebite in humans (around ~12% of the total yearly snakebite records), and men are more frequently bitten than women (2/3 of human victims are men). Most bites occur during the rainy season for cobra and green pit viper, while krait bites are not restricted to any particular season. As snakebite incidents are closely related to climate conditions, we can model snakebite risk using temperature and precipitation variables. Whereas there is a lack of snakebite reports from several parts of the study area in official records, our models predict that the entire study area is favourable for snakebite incidents. Based on the combined evidence we estimate that about 200,000 snakebite events occur every year in the south-eastern part of Bangladesh alone. Considering future global climate change, our model projections show that snakebite incidence in Bangladesh might not significantly decrease in the future (- 2070-); however, the distribution of probabilities might change, with a predicted increase of snakebite incidence in the hilly areas of the country.

conclusionsUsing climatic data to predict snakebite incidence in Bangladesh allowed us to provide estimations of the total annual number of snakebite cases in the study area. As in most countries, the scarcity of accurate epidemiological data in official records might have masked the real magnitude of this problem. Our analysis suggests that the problem of snakebite envenoming in Bangladesh might be worse than currently perceived. A long-term sustainable snakebite program plan should be designed and institutionalized, considering climatic, geographical and human demographic variables, to obtain better data and facilitate the implementation of accurate snakebite management programs for this country.

Indexed as

Snake BitesAdolescentAdultAnimalsBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSeasonsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38768190
PMCPMC11142713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.