Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768166›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Visualising and quantifying the usefulness of new predictors stratified by outcome class: The U-smile method.

Katarzyna B Kubiak, Barbara Więckowska, Elżbieta Jodłowska-Siewert, Przemysław Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarzyna B KubiakDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1811-2583
Barbara WięckowskaDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1811-2583
Elżbieta Jodłowska-SiewertDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Przemysław GuzikDepartment of Cardiology - Intensive Therapy and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binary classification methods encompass various algorithms to categorize data points into two distinct classes. Binary prediction, in contrast, estimates the likelihood of a binary event occurring. We introduce a novel graphical and quantitative approach, the U-smile method, for assessing prediction improvement stratified by binary outcome class. The U-smile method utilizes a smile-like plot and novel coefficients to measure the relative and absolute change in prediction compared with the reference method. The likelihood-ratio test was used to assess the significance of the change in prediction. Logistic regression models using the Heart Disease dataset and generated random variables were employed to validate the U-smile method. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the results of the U-smile method. The likelihood-ratio test demonstrated that the proposed coefficients consistently generated smile-shaped U-smile plots for the most informative predictors. The U-smile plot proved more effective than the ROC curve in comparing the effects of adding new predictors to the reference method. It effectively highlighted differences in model performance for both non-events and events. Visual analysis of the U-smile plots provided an immediate impression of the usefulness of different predictors at a glance. The U-smile method can guide the selection of the most valuable predictors. It can also be helpful in applications beyond prediction.

Indexed as

ROC CurveAlgorithmsHeart DiseasesHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID38768166
PMCPMC11104627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.