Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768153›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

An interpretable machine learning model for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated liver injury.

Chengli Wen, Xu Zhang, Yong Li, Wanmeng Xiao, Qinxue Hu, Xianying Lei, Tao Xu, Sicheng Liang, Xiaolan Gao, Chao Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. A Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Model for Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury Using Routine Indicators.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chengli WenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8956-8898
Xu ZhangLuzhou Key Laboratory of Human Microecology and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Luzhou, China.
Yong LiSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Wanmeng XiaoLuzhou Key Laboratory of Human Microecology and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Luzhou, China.
Qinxue HuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xianying LeiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Sicheng LiangLuzhou Key Laboratory of Human Microecology and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Luzhou, China.
Xiaolan GaoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Chao ZhangLuzhou Key Laboratory of Human Microecology and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Luzhou, China.
Zehui YuLaboratory Animal Center, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Muhan LüLuzhou Key Laboratory of Human Microecology and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Luzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury (SALI) is an independent risk factor for death from sepsis. The aim of this study was to develop an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in patients with SALI. Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV, v2.2, MIMIC-III, v1.4) were used in this study. The study cohort from MIMIC-IV was randomized to the training set (0.7) and the internal validation set (0.3), with MIMIC-III (2001 to 2008) as external validation. The features with more than 20% missing values were deleted and the remaining features were multiple interpolated. Lasso-CV that lasso linear model with iterative fitting along a regularization path in which the best model is selected by cross-validation was used to select important features for model development. Eight machine learning models including Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), K Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Generalized Linear Models in which the best model is selected by cross-validation (CV_glmnet), and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were developed. Shapley additive interpretation (SHAP) was used to improve the interpretability of the optimal model. At last, a total of 1043 patients were included, of whom 710 were from MIMIC-IV and 333 from MIMIC-III. Twenty-four clinically relevant parameters were selected for model construction. For the prediction of 28-day mortality of SALI in the internal validation set, the area under the curve (AUC (95% CI)) of RF was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86), and which performed the best. Compared with the traditional disease severity scores including Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and Acute Physiology Score III (APS III), RF also had the best performance. SHAP analysis found that Urine output, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), minimal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS_min), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and admission_age were the five most important features affecting RF model. Therefore, RF has good predictive ability for 28-day mortality prediction in SALI. Urine output, CCI, GCS_min, BUN and age at admission(admission_age) within 24 h after intensive care unit(ICU) admission contribute significantly to model prediction.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSepsisAgedFemaleHumansLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38768153
PMCPMC11104601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.