Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38768129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Rapid respiratory microbiological point-of-care-testing and antibiotic prescribing in primary care: Protocol for the RAPID-TEST randomised controlled trial.

Samantha Elizabeth Abbs, Lindsay Armstrong-Buisseret, Kathy Eastwood, Stephen Granier, Athene Lane, Mandy Lui, Chris Metcalfe, Paul Mitchell, Peter Muir, Matthew Ridd and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Rapid microbiological respiratory point-of-care testing: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Samantha Elizabeth AbbsBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9905-2737
Lindsay Armstrong-BuisseretBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kathy EastwoodPatient Representative, United Kingdom.
Stephen GranierWhiteladies Medical Group, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Athene LaneBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mandy LuiBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-4404-2084
Chris MetcalfeBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-8907
Paul MitchellBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter MuirUKHSA South West Regional Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2697-0892
Matthew RiddCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jodi TaylorBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Grace YoungBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are prescribed for over 50% of respiratory tract infections in primary care, despite good evidence of there being no benefit to the patient, and evidence of over prescribing driving microbial resistance. The high treatment rates are attributed to uncertainty regarding microbiological cause and clinical prognosis. Point-of-care-tests have been proposed as potential antibiotic stewardship tools, with some providing microbiological results in 15 minutes. However, there is little research on their impact on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in primary care.

methodsThis is a multi-centre, individually randomised controlled trial with mixed-methods investigation of microbial, behavioural and antibiotic mechanisms on outcomes in patients aged 12 months and over presenting to primary care in the UK with a suspected respiratory tract infection, where the clinician and/or patient thinks antibiotic treatment may be, or is, necessary. Once consented, all participants are asked to provide a combined nose and throat swab sample and randomised to have a rapid microbiological point-of-care-test or no point-of-care-test. For intervention patients, clinicians review the result of the test, before contacting the patient to finalise treatment. Treatment decisions are made as per usual care in control group patients. The primary outcome is whether an antibiotic is prescribed at this point. All swab samples are sent to the central laboratory for further testing. Patients are asked to complete a diary to record the severity and duration of symptoms until resolution or day 28, and questionnaires at 2 months about their beliefs and intention to consult for similar future illnesses. Primary care medical records are also reviewed at 6-months to collect further infection consultations, antibiotic prescribing and hospital admissions. The trial aims to recruit 514 patients to achieve 90% power with 5% significance to detect a 15% absolute reduction in antibiotic prescribing. Qualitative interviews are being conducted with approximately 20 clinicians and 30 participants to understand any changes in beliefs and behaviour resulting from the point-of-care-test and generate attributes for clinician and patient discrete choice experiments. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence of efficacy, acceptability and mechanisms of action of a rapid microbiological point-of-care test on antibiotic prescribing and patient symptoms in primary care.

trial registrationISRCTN16039192, prospectively registered on 08/11/2022.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPoint-of-Care TestingPrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsAntimicrobial StewardshipFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPoint-of-Care SystemsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38768129
PMCPMC11104596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.