Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38767966›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2024

A global neuronal workspace model of functional neurological disorders.

Lionel Naccache, Esteban Munoz-Musat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lionel NaccacheInstitut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France- Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-1009
Esteban Munoz-MusatInstitut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France- Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3477-3429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce here a general model of Functional Neurological Disorders based on the following hypothesis: a Functional Neurological Disorder could correspond to a consciously initiated voluntary top-down process causing involuntary lasting consequences that are consciously experienced and subjectively interpreted by the patient as involuntary. We develop this central hypothesis according to Global Neuronal Workspace theory of consciousness, that is particularly suited to describe interactions between conscious and non-conscious cognitive processes. We then present a list of predictions defining a research program aimed at empirically testing their validity. Finally, this general model leads us to reinterpret the long-debated links between hypnotic suggestion and functional neurological disorders. Driven by both scientific and therapeutic goals, this theoretical paper aims at bringing closer the psychiatric and neurological worlds of functional neurological disorders with the latest developments of cognitive neuroscience of consciousness.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessNervous System DiseasesBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalNeuronsConsciousnessConversionFunctional neurological disordersGlobal Neuronal Workspace TheoryHypnosisHysteriaNeurologyPsychiatrySuggestionUnconscious

Identifiers

PMID38767966
PMCPMC11107854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.