ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Clinical analysis of surgical outcome of 89 patients having large cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Branching patterns and variations of the anterior choroidal artery: a detailed cadaveric morphometric analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Distribution of branches of anterior choroidal artery in the uncus: an anatomical study.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor: Clinical analysis of surgical outcome of 89 patients having large cerebral arteriovenous malformations.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe article analyzes the clinical features, morphological characteristics, surgical subtleties and long-term outcome of surgery in 89 cases of 'large' sized AVMs. MATERIALS AND
methodsDuring the period 2004 to 2022, 89 cases of 'large' arteriovenous malformations were operated in the neurosurgery departments of the authors. Large AVMs were defined as those that were more than 4 cm on either lateral or antero-posterior view of digital subtraction angiogram. The factors that determined the extent of surgical difficulties included site and eloquence of the area, number of feeding vascular territories and draining veins, degree and rate of flow, presence of flow-related aneurysms, and the physical nature of the arteriovenous malformation.
resultsThere were 59 males and 30 females and the average age was 32 years. Headache, giddiness and convulsions were the common presenting complaints. Six patients were unconscious after surgery. Of these, five patients died in the immediate post-operative period and one patient gradually recovered. Additionally, seven patients developed unilateral limb weakness that included hemiplegia (4 patients) and hemiparesis (3 patients) following surgery. Clinical follow-up ranged from 6 months to 18 years (average 43 months). All surviving patients are leading normal and essentially symptom free life and have recovered from their symptoms of headache, convulsions and giddiness.
conclusionsLarge AVMs are amenable to 'curative' surgery with 'acceptable' results. The surgery can be challenging and appropriate case selection that is based on the surgeons experience is vital and decisive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38767778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.