Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38767719›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Prediction of response to promising first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients with residual peritoneal tumors: practical biomarkers and robust multiplex models.

Reika Kawabata-Iwakawa, Norihiro Iwasa, Kenichi Satoh, Jacques Colinge, Muneaki Shimada, Satoshi Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Hidetaka Eguchi, Tetsuro Oishi, Toru Sugiyama and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Reika Kawabata-Iwakawa *Division of Integrated Oncology Research, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Norihiro Iwasa *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Kenichi SatohFaculty of Data Science, Shiga University, Hikone, Shiga, 522-8522, Japan.
Jacques ColingeCancer Bioinformatics and System Biology, Institute of Cancer Research of Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm, University of Montpellier, ICM, 34298, Montpellier, France.
Muneaki ShimadaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Satoshi TakeuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Kobe Tokushukai Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, 655-0017, Japan.
Hiroyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Hidetaka EguchiDivision of Translational Research, Research Center for Genomic Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1241, Japan.
Tetsuro OishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Toru SugiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.
Mitsuaki SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Kosei HasegawaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Keiichi FujiwaraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Masahiko NishiyamaDivision of Integrated Oncology Research, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan. m.nishiyama@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-7183

Funding

Development Organization for Frontier Medical Education and Therapeutics in Japan DOFMET-08Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (JP) New Paradigms - Establishing Center for Fostering Medical Researchers of the Future ProgramsMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (JP) Promotion Plan for the Platform of Human Resource Development for CancerMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (JP) the Fostering Health Professionals for Changing Needs of CancerMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (JP) University Reform Action Plan "Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR)Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (JP) University Reform Action Plan "Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR)"Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H21-3rd Comprehensive 10-year Strategy for Cancer Control-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlatinum/taxane (TC) chemotherapy with debulking surgery stays the mainstay of the treatment in ovarian cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, and recently its novel modality, intraperitoneal carboplatin with dose-dense paclitaxel (ddTCip), was shown to have greater therapeutic impact. Nevertheless, the response varies among patients and consequent recurrence, or relapse often occurs. Discovery of therapeutic response predictor to ddTCip and/or TC therapy is eagerly awaited to improve the treatment outcome.

methodsUsing datasets in 76 participants in our ddTCip study and published databases on patients received TC therapy, we first validated a total of 75 previously suggested markers, sought out more active biomarkers through the association analyses of genome-wide transcriptome and genotyping data with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events, and then developed multiplex statistical prediction models for PFS and toxicity by mainly using multiple regression analysis and the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm.

resultsThe association analyses revealed that SPINK1 could be a possible biomarker of ddTCip efficacy, while ABCB1 rs1045642 and ERCC1 rs11615 would be a predictor of hematologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy, respectively. Multiple regression analyses and CART algorithm finally provided a potent efficacy prediction model using 5 gene expression data and robust multiplex toxicity prediction models-CART models using a total of 4 genotype combinations and multiple regression models using 15 polymorphisms on 12 genes.

conclusionBiomarkers and multiplex models composed here could work well in the response prediction of ddTCip and/or TC therapy, which might contribute to realize optimal selection of the key therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanPaclitaxelFirst-line chemotherapyIntraperitoneal carboplatin plus intravenous dose-dense paclitaxel (ddTCip) therapyOvarian cancerPersonalized medicinePredictive biomarker of therapeutic response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.