ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2024
The comparison of four hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on drug potency and cost for treatment in patients with renal anemia.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of SLCO1B1 Gene Polymorphisms on Vadadustat Pharmacokinetics.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Observational
- Evidence-practice gaps in chronic kidney disease management among patients taking antidiabetic or antihypertensive medications: a nationwide analysis of Japanese primary care electronic health records.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Observational
- Review
- Hypoxia, ROS, and HIF Signaling in I/R Injury: Implications and Future Prospects.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of red blood cell distribution width on response to HIF-PH inhibitor in improving anemia and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFive hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have been approved for marketing in Japan. However, marked differences exist in terms of drug potency, dose requirement, and pharmacokinetics.
methodsThe primary evaluation in this study was the changes in hemoglobin levels, dose escalation, drug potency, and cost among HIF-PHIs, 3 months after the initiation of treatment.
resultsAll patients treated with HIF-PHI between August 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled in this study. In total, 124 patients were administered daprodustat (N = 37), enarodustat (N = 44), molidustat (N = 13), or vadadustat (N = 30). The mean hemoglobin levels of daprodustat, enarodustat, molidustat, and vadadustat at 3 months were 11.7 g/dL, 11.8 g/dL, 12.2 g/dL, and 11.3 g/dL, respectively. At 3 months, the mean doses of daprodustat, enarodustat, molidustat, and vadadustat increased by 110%, 177%, 125%, and 152%, respectively, from the initial dose. The HIF-PHI potency indices (HPI) of daprodustat, enarodustat, molidustat, and vadadustat at 3 months were 0.168, 0.307, 0.184, and 0.254, respectively. At 3 months, the mean daily costs of daprodustat, enarodustat, molidustat, and vadadustat were JPY 345, JPY 434, JPY 206, and JPY 565, respectively.
conclusionThe difference in dose escalation for anemia treatment among HIF-PHIs is due to differences in drug potency, where the HPI significantly differs among HIF-PHIs. The disparity between the HPI and the cost of the initial dose accounts for the variance in the daily costs of renal anemia treatment among HIF-PHIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38767688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.