Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38767091›Full record

ReviewThe Gerontologist2024

Successful Aging and Subjective Aging: Toward a Framework to Research a Neglected Connection.

Serena Sabatini, Fiona Rupprecht, Roman Kaspar, Verena Klusmann, Anna Kornadt, Jana Nikitin, Anton Schönstein, Yannick Stephan, Markus Wettstein, Susanne Wurm and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The respective roles of negative and positive views of aging in predicting rehabilitation outcomes.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Serena SabatiniDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-6949
Fiona RupprechtDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-0497
Roman KasparCharlotte Fresenius University of Psychology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5829-2363
Verena KlusmannDepartment of Health, Security, and Society, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-7793
Anna KornadtInstitute for Lifespan Development, Family, & Culture, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-0812
Jana NikitinDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1642-154X
Anton SchönsteinNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-5452
Yannick StephanEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8029-8809
Markus WettsteinDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-5405
Susanne WurmDepartment of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Institute for Community Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6924-8299
Manfred DiehlDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-3839
Hans-Werner WahlNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-3239

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/X007766/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research related to subjective aging, which describes how individuals perceive, interpret, and evaluate their own aging, has substantially grown in the past 2 decades. Evidence from longitudinal studies shows that subjective aging predicts health, quality of life, and functioning in later life. However, the existing literature on successful aging has mostly neglected the role of subjective aging. This paper proposes an extended framework of successful aging linking subjective aging conceptually and empirically to Rowe and Kahn's ((1997). Successful aging. Gerontologist, 37(4), 433-440) 3 original key criteria of successful aging (i.e., avoiding disease and disability, maintaining high cognitive and physical function, and engagement with life). A particular focus is placed on subjective aging as an antecedent of successful aging. A review of the empirical subjective aging literature shows that subjective aging concepts consistently predict all 3 of Rowe and Kahn's criteria of successful aging. Mechanisms underlying these relations are discussed at 3 levels, namely psychological, behavioral, and physiological pathways. The proposed addition also takes into consideration the interconnections between subjective aging and successful aging throughout the life span and across historical time. Finally, we discuss the importance of facilitating successful aging through systematic interventions that support more positive views of aging at the individual and societal levels.

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingQuality of LifeSelf ConceptAgedHumanscognitive healthDevelopmental outcomesHealth-enhancing behaviorsHealthy agingMentalphysicalSelf-perceptions of aging

Identifiers

PMID38767091
PMCPMC11879306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.