Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766877›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2025

Making Choices: A Multi-institutional, Longitudinal Cohort Study Assessing Changes in Treatment Outcome Valuation for Low-risk Thyroid Cancer.

Alexis G Antunez, Brandy R Sinco, Megan C Saucke, Kyle J Bushaw, Catherine B Jensen, Sophie Dream, Abbey L Fingeret, Masha J Livhits, Aarti Mathur, Alexandria McDow and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Communication of Voice-Related Complications in Thyroidectomy: A Qualitative Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexis G AntunezBrigham and Women's Hospital.
Brandy R SincoUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Megan C SauckeUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Kyle J BushawUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Catherine B JensenUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Sophie DreamMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Abbey L FingeretUniversity of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
Masha J LivhitsUniversity of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Aarti MathurJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Alexandria McDowIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Sanziana A RomanUniversity of California-San Francisco; San Francisco, CA.
Corrine I VoilsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Justin SydnorUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Susan C PittUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
CHOiCE Collaborative (Comparing Health Outcomes in Cancer Experience)

Funding

University of Michigan Surgical Oncology Research Training ProgramT32CA009672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JACQUELINE SARA JERUSS, WEIPING ZOU · 1991 to 2026
$6.0M
Cognitive Decline and Incident Dementia in Older Patients with Secondary HyperparathyroidismR01AG076834 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Aarti Mathur · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
Impact of Emotions on Treatment Decisions About Low-Risk Thyroid CancerK08CA230204 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PITT, SUSAN C · 2018 to 2023
$1.4M
A Pilot Feasibility Study of an Intervention to Decrease Overtreatment of Low-risk Thyroid CancerR03CA283105 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PITT, SUSAN C · 2023 to 2024
$168k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA230204NCI NIH HHS R03 CA283105NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009672NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the relative importance of treatment outcomes to patients with low-risk thyroid cancer (TC).

backgroundOveruse of total thyroidectomy (TT) for low-risk TC is common. Emotions from a cancer diagnosis may lead patients to choose TT, resulting in outcomes that do not align with their preferences.

methodsAdults with clinically low-risk TC enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort study from November 2019 to June 2021. Participants rated treatment outcomes at the time of their surgical decision and again 9 months later by allocating 100 points among 10 outcomes. t tests and Hotelling T 2 statistic compared outcome valuation within and between subjects based on chosen extent of surgery (TT vs lobectomy).

resultsOf 177 eligible patients, 125 participated (70.6% response) and 114 completed the 9-month follow-up (91.2% retention). At the time of the treatment decision, patients choosing TT valued the risk of recurrence more than those choosing lobectomy and the need to take thyroid hormone less ( P <0.05). At repeat valuation, all patients assigned fewer points to cancer being removed and the impact of treatment on their voice and more points to energy levels ( P <0.05). The importance of the risk of recurrence increased for those who chose lobectomy and decreased for those choosing TT ( P <0.05).

conclusionsThe relative importance of treatment outcomes changes for patients with low-risk TC once the outcome has been experienced to favor quality of life over emotion-related outcomes. Surgeons can use this information to discuss the potential for asthenia or changes in energy levels associated with total thyroidectomy.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPatient PreferenceThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeconstant sum scaledecision-makingoutcomesthyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID38766877
PMCPMC11576482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.