Observational studyOrthopaedic surgery2024
Posterior Corrective Surgery for Type II Congenital Kyphosis: SRS-Schwab Grade 4 Osteotomy or Vertebral Column Resection?
Observational study in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Position Minimally Invasive Retropleural Asymmetric Vertebral Column Resection and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lateral Position for Congenital Kyphoscoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Closing-opening vertebral column resection for thoracolumbar congenital kyphosis: technical note and case report.Spine deformity · 2025Article
- Neurological Evaluation of Severe Congenital Kyphosis With Compressive Myelopathy in 39 Patients With a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSurgical decision-making for congenital kyphosis (CK) with failure of anterior segmentation (type II) has been contradictory regarding the trade-off between the pursuit of correction rate and the inherent risk of the osteotomy procedure. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic measurement in type II CK underwent SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR), the most-adapted osteotomy techniques for CK, and to propose the strategy to select between the two procedures.
methodsThis retrospective observational comparative study evaluated surgical outcomes in type II CK patients underwent VCR or SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy at our institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients operated with VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Radiographic parameters and SRS-22 quality of life metrics were assessed at pre-operation, post-operation, and during follow-up visits for both groups, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes.
resultsThirty-one patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) aged 16.3 ± 10.4 years were recruited. Correction of segmental kyphosis was similar between groups (51.1 ± 17.6° in Group 1 and 48.4 ± 19.8° in Group 2, p = 0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9 ± 81.2 vs 221.4 ± 78.9, p < 0.001) and more estimated blood loss (975.2 ± 275.8 ml vs 725.9 ± 204.3 mL, p = 0.011). Alert event of intraoperative sensory and motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP) monitoring was observed in 1 patient of Group 2. Both groups had 1 transient post operative neurological deficit respectively.
conclusionSRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy was suitable for kyphotic mass when its apex is the upper unsegmented vertebrae or the neighboring disc, or when the apical vertebrae with an anterior/posterior (A/P) height ratio of vertebral body higher than 1/3. VCR is suitable when the apex is located within the unsegmented mass with its A/P height ratio lower than 1/3. Proper selection of VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy according to our strategy, could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcomes in type II CK patients during a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients undergoing VCR procedure might have longer operation time, more blood loss and higher incidence of peri- and post-operative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.