ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Radiological Verification for the Suitability of Using the Quadriceps Angle to Represent Orientation of the Quadriceps Femoris.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe orientation of the quadriceps femoris can be represented by the quadriceps angle (Q-angle) has not yet been approved because of the high incidence of patellar instability. In this study, the correlations among components of the quadriceps femoris and the Q-angle using the plain radiographic technique were assessed. This retrospective study aims to use the radiographic technique to clarify these doubts from anatomic viewpoints.
methodsOne hundred consecutive young adult patients (50 men and 50 women; aged, 34 ± 5 and 33 ± 6 years, respectively) who sustained chronic unilateral lower extremity injuries (unilateral femoral, tibial nonunions or malunions) were enrolled. The contralateral intact lower extremity was used for the study. The full-length standing scanogram (FLSS) was used to evaluate the rectus Q-angle (R-Q angle), vastus Q-angle (V-Q angle), and clinical Q-angle (C-Q angle; i.e., known as the Q-angle). The three Q-angles were compared statistically. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for comparison among groups. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the degree of relationship between two groups.
resultsThe C-Q angle or the V-Q angle was statistically different from the R-Q angle (p < 0.001). The C-Q angle between sexes was not different (p = 0.25). High correlation occurred among the C-Q angle, the R-Q angle, and the V-Q angles (correlation coefficient, 0.886-0.979). The multiple linear regression revealed of C-Q angle = 0.72; R-Q angle, p < 0.001 + 0.21; and V-Q angle, (p = 0.009) + 2.61° in 100 patients.
conclusionOrientation of the quadriceps femoris can be represented by the Q-angle. Compared to the rectus femoris, the three vastus muscles of the quadriceps femoris are more correlated to the Q-angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.