Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766775›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2024

Appropriateness of intended antibiotic prescribing using clinical case vignettes in primary care, and related factors.

Tristan Delory, Alexis Maillard, Florence Tubach, Pierre-Yves Böelle, Elisabeth Bouvet, Sylvie Lariven, Pauline Jeanmougin, Josselin Le Bel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tristan DeloryAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-8934
Alexis MaillardAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7165-4103
Florence TubachSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-944X
Pierre-Yves BöelleSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5367-8232
Elisabeth BouvetAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0905-4078
Sylvie LarivenAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.
Pauline JeanmouginAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6505-2125
Josselin Le BelAntibioclic Steering Committee, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-209X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care have been poorly explored. In particular, the impact of computerised decision-support systems (CDSS) remains unknown.

objectivesWe aim at investigating the uptake of CDSS and its association with physician characteristics and professional activity.

methodsSince May 2022, users of a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in primary care in France have been invited, when registering, to complete three case vignettes assessing clinical situations frequently encountered in general practice and identified as at risk of antibiotic misuse. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined as the rate of answers in line with the current guidelines, computed by individuals and by specific questions. Physician's characteristics associated with individual appropriate antibiotic prescribing (< 50%, 50-75% and > 75% appropriateness) were identified by multivariate ordinal logistic regression.

resultsIn June 2023, 60,067 physicians had registered on the CDSS. Among the 13,851 physicians who answered all case vignettes, the median individual appropriateness level of antibiotic prescribing was 77.8% [Interquartile range, 66.7%-88.9%], and was < 50% for 1,353 physicians (10%). In the multivariate analysis, physicians' characteristics associated with appropriateness were prior use of the CDSS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87), being a general practitioner vs. other specialist (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49), working in primary care (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), mentoring students (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21) age (OR = 0.69 per 10 years increase, 95% CI 0.67-0.71).

conclusionIndividual appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing was high among CDSS users, with a higher rate in young general practitioners, previously using the system. CDSS could improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsInappropriate PrescribingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAdultDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleFranceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticappropriatenesscomputerized decision support systemscross-sectionalprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38766775
PMCPMC11107848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.