ArticleFuture healthcare journal2024
Preparing tomorrow's doctors for the genomics era: A nationwide survey of UK medical students.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic literacy assessment among medical students using the Indonesian adaptation of the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study of genomic knowledge comfort, attitudes, ethical and educational perspectives on precision medicine among medical students in Ecuador.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Moving beyond good intentions: a qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals' perspectives on delivering equitable prenatal testing in the English NHS.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Nephrogenomics, precision medicine and the role of genetic testing in adult kidney disease management.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Genomics as part of Portuguese undergraduate nursing programs: are we moving in the right direction?Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Perceptions of genomic newborn screening: a cross-sectional survey conducted with UK medical students.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Delivery of a national prenatal exome sequencing service in England: a mixed methods study exploring healthcare professionals' views and experiences.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Low confidence in genomics knowledge among clinicians is a major barrier to the integration of genomics into mainstream medicine. Here, we assessed the genomics confidence of UK medical students approaching graduation. Methods: We conducted a web-based nationwide survey of UK medical students in the final 2 years of study where participants rated their confidence in genomics concepts. Results: In total, 145 medical students across 19 medical schools participated. The amount of genomics teaching students reported receiving was positively associated with genomics confidence, with the amount of basic science teaching having the strongest influence. While confidence was high in core genomics principles, such as the difference between DNA, genes and chromosomes (95%), confidence dropped in clinical applications of genomics - only 50% reported a good understanding of the genetic contribution to disease and 28% reported good knowledge of clinically used genomic tests. Overall, 59% reported a poor understanding of variant interpretation; however, over half who reported receiving 'lots' of genomic medicine teaching reported a good understanding of this topic. Conclusion: Gaps in genomics knowledge and drivers in confidence have been identified herein, highlighting the need for improvements in undergraduate genomics education to prepare future doctors to confidently practise in the genomics era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.