ArticleFuture healthcare journal2024
The role of the physician associate in the United Kingdom.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of physician assistants on quality of care: rapid review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Rediscovering purpose in our well-being journey as emergency physicians: an international perspective.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The origin of theFuture healthcare journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician associates (PAs) were introduced in the United Kingdom to address staffing shortages and fill service gaps, aiming to unburden doctors. Notably, in the backdrop of recent high-profile cases involving professional negligence and misconduct by PAs, the government has outlined a plan to expand the PA workforce and broaden their scope of practice. This commentary critically assesses the role, training, and regulation of PAs, juxtaposing the UK's approach with the US model. Concerns regarding disparities in training between PAs and doctors, potential impact on patient care quality, and lessons from the US experience raise substantial questions. Recommendations are provided to align with patient safety, professional standards, and the unique demands of the National Health Service (NHS). Despite the government's efforts to expand the PA workforce and its scope, uncertainties persist regarding their contribution to patient care and the implications for medical profesionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.