Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766579›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023

The effect of Tecar therapy on neurological disorders and nerve conduction velocity of lower limbs in peripheral neuropathy of type 2 diabetic patients: A six-week follow-up study.

Maryam Niajalili, Mohamad Mohsen Roostayi, Aliyeh Daryabor, Sedigheh Sadat Naimi, Mitra Javan Amoli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660328 (Effect of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Post Burn), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660328 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Post Burn

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burnArmsTransfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive (TECAR) [ SMART TECAR }, Standard Hand Rehabilitation [ US }
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maryam NiajaliliDepartment of Physiotheraphy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-6969
Mohamad Mohsen RoostayiPhysiotherapy Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-6505
Aliyeh DaryaborPhysiotherapy Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-6025
Sedigheh Sadat NaimiPhysiotherapy Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-5737
Mitra Javan AmoliStudent Research Committee, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-6880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Tecar therapy on neuropathy symptoms and tibial nerve conduction velocity in individuals with diabetes. Patients and methods: The single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted between January 2019 and October 2019. Twenty-four type 2 diabetics (8 males, 16 females; mean age: 60.4±8.9 years; range, 40 to 78 years) with peripheral neuropathy were randomly allocated to control (n=12) and study (n=12) groups. The study group received the capacitive Tecar therapy with 10 to 30% intensity and infrared radiation in 10 sessions. The controls received the same protocol with zero intensity. The neuropathy symptoms and nerve conduction velocity were evaluated at baseline, after 10 sessions, and six weeks after the end of sessions. Results: There were no significant differences in variables (p>0.05). In this way, the homogeneity of the data variables was confirmed. Moreover, the results of two-way mixed analysis of variance showed that improvement of neuropathy symptoms in the study group was significantly more than controls in all stages (p<0.001). After 10 sessions, the results of post hoc analysis showed that the neuropathy symptoms and tibial nerve conduction velocity were significantly improved in both groups (p<0.05). However, there was no change in these outcomes after six weeks in the control group (p>0.05). Conclusion: Tecar therapy could improve neuropathy symptoms and tibial nerve conduction velocity in diabetic individuals with peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, the use of this method to control the symptoms of diabetic patients can be recommended.

Indexed as

Diabetic neuropathynerve conduction velocityneuropathy symptomsTecar therapy

Identifiers

PMID38766579
PMCPMC11099859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.