ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Survival and outcomes of isolated neonatal ventricular septal defects: A population-based study from a middle-income country.
Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antenatal spectrum of congenital heart disease: Experience from a Northern Indian referral unit.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Hybrid approach: a prospective option for treating congenital heart defects in pediatric patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Limited data on the survival and outcomes of ventricular septal defect (VSD) in middle-income countries are available. Hence, this study aims to determine the survival and factors associated with mortality among neonatal VSD. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, population based study of neonates with isolated VSD born between 2009 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with mortality. Results: There were 726 patients studied, with 82 (11%) of them having trisomy 21. The median age of diagnosis and follow-up was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-10 days) and 2.3 years (IQR: 0.6-4.8 years), respectively. Of 726, 399 (55%) were perimembranous, 218 (30%) muscular, and 109 (15%) outlet VSD. VSD was small in 309 (42%), moderate in 337 (46%), and large in 80 (11%). Of 726 patients, 189 (26%) had congestive heart failure (CHF) and 52 (7.2%) developed pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Interestingly, one-third of CHF and PHT resolved over time during follow-up. Only 1 (0.1%) patient had infective endocarditis, 38 (5.2%) developed aortic regurgitation, and none had Eisenmenger syndrome. Overall, 149 (20%) needed surgery, 399 (55%) spontaneously closed, and 178 (25%) remained small. The mortality rate was 3.9% (28), 16 (57%) preoperatively, and 11 (39%) due to pneumonia. Trisomy 21, PHT, and birth weight <2.5 kg were independent factors for mortality with an adjusted hazard ratio of 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-16.9), 3.2 (95% CI: 1.2-8.4), and 3.6 (95% CI: 1.7-7.8), respectively. The overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96% (95% CI: 95-98), 95% (95% CI: 94-97), and 95% (95% CI: 94-97), respectively. Conclusions: Despite limited pediatric and congenital cardiac services in middle-income countries, the overall survival of neonatal VSD is good, with poor outcomes in small infants, PHT, and trisomy 21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.