Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766360›Full record

ArticleDigital health

A machine learning-based model for "In-time" prediction of periprosthetic joint infection.

Weishen Chen, Xuantao Hu, Chen Gu, Zhaohui Zhang, Linli Zheng, Baiqi Pan, Xiaoyu Wu, Wei Sun, Puyi Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Machine Learning Based Diagnostic Models for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weishen ChenDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuantao HuDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen GuSchool of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaohui ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Linli ZhengDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Baiqi PanDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyu WuDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei SunSchool of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Puyi ShengDepartment of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-2161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous criteria had limited value in early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Here, we constructed a novel machine learning (ML)-derived, "in-time" diagnostic system for PJI and proved its validity. Methods: We filtered "in-time" diagnostic indicators reported in the literature based on our continuous retrospective cohort of PJI and aseptic prosthetic loosening patients. With the indicators, we developed a two-level ML model with six base learners including Elastic Net, Linear Support Vector Machine, Kernel Support Vector Machine, Extra Trees, Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Multilayer Perceptron), and one meta-learner, Ensemble Learning of Weighted Voting. The prediction performance of this model was compared with those of previous diagnostic criteria (International Consensus Meeting in 2018 (ICM 2018), etc.). Another prospective cohort was used for internal validation. Based on our ML model, a user-friendly web tool was developed for swift PJI diagnosis in clinical practice. Results: A total of 254 patients (199 for development and 55 for validation cohort) were included in this study with 38.2% of them diagnosed as PJI. We included 21 widely accessible features including imaging indicators (X-ray and CT) in the model. The sensitivity and accuracy of our ML model were significantly higher than ICM 2018 in development cohort (90.6% vs. 76.1%, Conclusions: Our novel ML-derived PJI "in-time" diagnostic system demonstrated significantly improved diagnostic potency for surgical decision-making compared with the commonly used criteria. Moreover, our web-based tool greatly assisted surgeons in distinguishing PJI patients comprehensively. Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level III.

Indexed as

aseptic loosening of prosthesisdecision-makingdiagnosismachine learningperiprosthetic joint infectionweb tool

Identifiers

PMID38766360
PMCPMC11100394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.