ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Bibliometric analysis of hotspots and trends of global myopia research.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between peripheral retinal lesions and ocular biometric parameters in adults with mild-to-moderate myopia attending a refractive surgery clinic.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Preoperative information needs and preferences of refractive surgery patients: a discrete choice experiment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven transformation of pediatric eye health education based on bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Age-indexed cumulative risk of high myopia estimated from axial length and early axial elongation: a 7-year school-based longitudinal cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Global research trends in vitreous floaters from 1999 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Global trends and hotspots in artificial intelligence for high myopia: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative analysis of retinal vascular parameters changes in school-age children with refractive error using artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo gain insights into the global research hotspots and trends of myopia.
methodsArticles were downloaded from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 from the Science Core Database website and were mainly statistically analyzed by bibliometrics software.
resultsA total of 444 institutions in 87 countries published 4124 articles. Between 2013 and 2022, China had the highest number of publications (
conclusionMyopia has become a hot research field. China and Chinese institutions have the strongest academic influence in the field from 2013 to 2022. The main driver of myopic research is still medical or ophthalmologists. This study highlights the importance of public health in addressing the global rise in myopia, especially its impact on children's health. At present, a unified theoretical system is still needed. Accurate surgical and therapeutic solutions must be proposed for people with different characteristics to manage and intervene refractive errors. In addition, the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) models are also reflected in disease monitoring and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.