Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766331›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024

Risk factors of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion.

Chu-Han Ma, Cong-Yao Wang, Ting-Ting Dai, Ting-Ting Chen, Wen-Hui Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chu-Han MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Cong-Yao WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Ting-Ting DaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Ting-Ting ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Wen-Hui ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the difference in risk factors between non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and develop a predictive diagnostic nomogram.

methodsThe study included 37 patients with monocular NAION, 20 with monocular CRAO, and 24 with hypertension. Gender, age, and systemic diseases were recorded. Blood routine, lipids, hemorheology, carotid and brachial artery doppler ultrasound, and echocardiography were collected. The optic disc area, cup area, and cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) of the unaffected eye in the NAION and CRAO group and the right eye in the hypertension group were measured.

resultsThe carotid artery intimal medial thickness (C-IMT) of the affected side of the CRAO group was thicker (

conclusionCRAO patients show thicker C-IMT and worse endothelial function than NAION. NAION and CRAO may be related to abnormal hemorheology. A small cup and small C/D may be involved in NAION. The diagnostic nomogram can be used to preliminarily identify NAION and CRAO.

Indexed as

central retinal artery occlusiondiagnostic prediction modelnomogramnon-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38766331
PMCPMC11074200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.