ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024
Influence of apigenin and seashell nanoparticles on the biological attitude of soft denture liner.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Luteolin Nanoparticles on Bond Strength, Hardness, and Roughness of Tissue Conditioners: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the "biocompatibility" of a soft denture liner impregnated with apigenin and seashell nanoparticles via histopathological assessment in rabbit models. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six albino rabbits aged 5-7 months and weighing, 1.25-1.5 kg were randomly divided into apigenin and seashell-modified groups, n = 13 each). A total of 104 disc-shaped specimens (3 mm thick and 5 mm in diameter) of a heat-cured soft liner, (GC, USA) were prepared. In the apigenin group, each rabbit was subcutaneously implanted with 4 specimens: (positive control, unmodified-liner, and 0.25 %, 0.5 %, and 1 % of apigenin-modified liner). In the seashell group, rabbits were implanted with positive control and 1.25 %, 2.5 % and 5 % seashell-modified liner. A non-implanted incision was performed for all the groups as a negative control. Histopathological observations were evaluated according to inflammatory and angiogenesis scores 14 days after implantation. Results: A significant decrease in inflammatory responses and an increase in angiogenesis were observed for both apigenin and seashell-modified soft liner groups. Higher compatibility effectiveness was positively related to and recorded in the increased ratios of nanoparticles within the soft liner material. Conclusion: Apigenin and seashell-modified soft liners at higher ratios 1% and 5% respectively were more compatible with the rabbit mucosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.