Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38766272›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2024

Genome editing and kidney health.

Nadia Tavakolidakhrabadi, Francesco Aulicino, Carl J May, Moin A Saleem, Imre Berger, Gavin I Welsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gene therapy and kidney diseases.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Review
  9. Reactive Oxygen Species in Cystic Kidney Disease.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia TavakolidakhrabadiBristol Renal, University of Bristol, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Whitson Street, Bristol, UK.
Francesco AulicinoBrisSynBio Bristol Synthetic Biology Centre, Biomedical Sciences, School of Biochemistry, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-3765
Carl J MayBristol Renal, University of Bristol, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Whitson Street, Bristol, UK.
Moin A SaleemBristol Renal, University of Bristol, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Whitson Street, Bristol, UK.
Imre BergerSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-9045
Gavin I WelshBristol Renal, University of Bristol, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Whitson Street, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing technologies, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas in particular, have revolutionized the field of genetic engineering, providing promising avenues for treating various genetic diseases. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant health concern affecting millions of individuals worldwide, can arise from either monogenic or polygenic mutations. With recent advancements in genomic sequencing, valuable insights into disease-causing mutations can be obtained, allowing for the development of new treatments for these genetic disorders. CRISPR-based treatments have emerged as potential therapies, especially for monogenic diseases, offering the ability to correct mutations and eliminate disease phenotypes. Innovations in genome editing have led to enhanced efficiency, specificity and ease of use, surpassing earlier editing tools such as zinc-finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Two prominent advancements in CRISPR-based gene editing are prime editing and base editing. Prime editing allows precise and efficient genome modifications without inducing double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), while base editing enables targeted changes to individual nucleotides in both RNA and DNA, promising disease correction in the absence of DSBs. These technologies have the potential to treat genetic kidney diseases through specific correction of disease-causing mutations, such as somatic mutations in

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas technologygene therapygenetic kidney diseasegenome editingprime editing

Identifiers

PMID38766272
PMCPMC11099665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.