ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Effects of
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with poor sleep quality in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A single-center cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Associations Between Measures of Hemodialysis Adequacy and Quality, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality: A Systematic Review.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Dialysis Adequacy and Quality of Life Among Haemodialysis Patients: Does Facility Type Matter? A Comparison Between Government and Private Centres in Klang Valley, Malaysia.International journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Clinical challenges and individualized approaches to dialysis therapy in older adults.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Prevalence, recurrence, risk factors and adverse clinical outcomes of hyperkalemia in maintenance hemodialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning models for predicting of protein-energy wasting in patients on maintenance haemodialysis.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The guidelines recommended target and minimum single-pool Methods: This study used the hemodialysis quality assessment program and claims datasets. Patients were divided into four subgroups according to age (<65, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years). Each group was divided into three subgroups according to Results: The low, ref, and high Conclusions: These results support the current recommendations of a minimum
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.