Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765908›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental hepatology2024

Endoscopic band ligation

Maha Elsabaawy, Osama Elbahr, Ahmed Edrees, Reda Badr, Ahmed Kamal, Sameh Afify

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maha ElsabaawyDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Osama ElbahrDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Ahmed EdreesDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Reda BadrDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Ahmed KamalDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.
Sameh AfifyDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) is challenging. Despite being the standard technique for resection of GHPs, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is risky in the setting of coagulation disorders associated with liver cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic band ligation (EBL), compared to HSP in resecting GHPs in cirrhotic patients. One hundred consecutive adults with liver cirrhosis and sessile or pedunculated GHPs were enrolled from December 2018 to December 2020. Cases were non-blindly randomized (1 : 1) to two groups to have GHPs managed by either EBL (group I) or HSP (group II). Data of demographic, clinical, and pathological factors, hospitalization expenses and outcomes of both treatment maneuvers were collected and statistically analyzed. Upper endoscopy was repeated for all patients at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment for recurrence detection. Between the two procedures, the mean operational time was significantly shorter in the EBL than the HSP group (15.1 ±3.80 min vs. 36.6 ±6.72 min,

Indexed as

endoscopic band ligationgastric polypshot snare polypectomyliver cirrhosistreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38765908
PMCPMC11100341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.