Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765898›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Management of Patients with Breast Biopsy under Anti-Coagulation or Anti-Platelet Therapy: Results of a Survey of German Experts.

Fabian Riedel, Markus Hahn, Werner Bader, Benedikt Schäfgen, Sarah Fastner, André Hennigs, Christina Gomez, Anne Stieber, Christian Fastner, Markus Wallwiener and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus HahnDepartment for Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Werner BaderDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bielefeld OWL University Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany.
Benedikt SchäfgenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah FastnerHeidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.
André HennigsHeidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christina GomezHeidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne StieberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian FastnerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, European Center for AngioScience (ECAS), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael GolattaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörg HeilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva Maria FallenbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pre-therapeutic histologic diagnosis through image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) for suspicious breast findings is a standard procedure. Despite the moderate risk of bleeding, a significant proportion of patients are on temporary or permanent anti-coagulation therapy (ACT) or anti-platelet therapy (APT). Currently, there are no established guidelines for managing biopsies in such patients, leading to varying approaches in clinical practice. Methods: An online survey was conducted among all members of the breast ultrasound working group at the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) and the working group for breast diagnostics at the German Radiology Society (DRG). It included Results: A total of 332 experts participated, with 51.8% reporting the absence of a standardized management plan for breast biopsies on ACT/APT. Concerning specific ACT/APT medications, the survey revealed discrepancies in risk perception and management: The majority preferred discontinuing medication with directly acting oral anti-coagulants (DOACs; CNB: 66.9%; VAB: 91.1%), phenprocoumon (CNB: 74.9%; VAB: 96.7%), or therapeutic heparin (CNB: 46.1%; VAB: 72.7%). However, there was a lower inclination to discontinue acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; CNB: 15.2%; VAB: 50.3%) or prophylactic heparin (CNB: 11.9%, VAB: 36.3%). Conclusion: Breast biopsies for patients on ASA or prophylactic heparin are deemed safe and part of standard clinical practice. However, despite available feasibility studies, conducting breast biopsies on ACT medications such as DOACs or phenprocoumon appears feasible only for a minority of experts.

Indexed as

Anti-coagulationAnti-platelet therapyBiopsyBreastExpert survey

Identifiers

PMID38765898
PMCPMC11096796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.