ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024
A systematic review of the use of shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567365 (Clinical Outcomes of Focused Shockwave Therapy Without Adjunct Rehabilitation Compared to Standard Physical Rehabilitation in Patients With Grade I-III Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Outcomes of Focused Shockwave Therapy Without Adjunct Rehabilitation Compared to Standard Physical Rehabilitation in Patients With Grade I-III Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomized Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for degenerative meniscal tears results in a decreased T2 relaxation time and pain relief: An exploratory randomized clinical trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2024Trial
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Pain Management - an In-Depth Narrative Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- [Conservative treatment of patellofemoral cartilage lesions and patellofemoral osteoarthritis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies assessed the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) among different situations. Thus, results from a meta-analysis regarding this topic may not be reliable due to heterogeneity. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on three internet databases, namely Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase, gathering pertinent papers from their establishment to March 2024. The search phrases were as follows: "shockwave" OR "shock wave" OR "extracorporeal shockwave" OR "Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy [MeSH Term]" AND "knee" AND ("osteoarthritis" OR "arthritis" OR "arthritic" OR "osteoarthritis [MeSH term]"). Results: Twenty-four articles (n = 888) were included, with the resulting conclusions demonstrating that ESWT was effective for knee OA compared with sham ESWT; however, ESWT was not effective for patients with severe knee OA. Patients receiving higher energy or higher shock number had significant improvement than those receiving lower energy or less shock number, respectively. Adding ESWT in isokinetic muscular strengthening exercises (IMSE) was more effective than IMSE alone. The efficacy of ESWT was better than other therapies, including intravenously applied prostacyclin and bisphosphonate, corticosteroid injection, kinesiotherapy, hyaluronic acid injection, platelet-rich plasma injection, and physiotherapy. Conclusions: This review demonstrated that ESWT was effective for knee OA. Higher energy and more shock numbers could obtain better efficacy. ESWT could be used as a replacement for some other therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.