Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765887›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2024

From Scalp to Ear-EEG: A Generalizable Transfer Learning Model for Automatic Sleep Scoring in Older People.

Ghena Hammour, Harry Davies, Giuseppe Atzori, Ciro Della Monica, Kiran K G Ravindran, Victoria Revell, Derk-Jan Dijk, Danilo P Mandic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghena HammourDepartment of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringImperial College London SW7 2BT London U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-4783
Harry DaviesDepartment of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringImperial College London SW7 2BT London U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-7506-2300
Giuseppe Atzori2Surrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Surrey GU2 7XH Guildford U.K.
Ciro Della Monica2Surrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Surrey GU2 7XH Guildford U.K.
Kiran K G Ravindran2Surrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Surrey GU2 7XH Guildford U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3051-0266
Victoria Revell2Surrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Surrey GU2 7XH Guildford U.K.
Derk-Jan Dijk2Surrey Sleep Research Centre, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Surrey GU2 7XH Guildford U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5314-1008
Danilo P MandicDepartment of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringImperial College London SW7 2BT London U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8432-3963

Funding

Medical Research Council UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSleep monitoring has extensively utilized electroencephalogram (EEG) data collected from the scalp, yielding very large data repositories and well-trained analysis models. Yet, this wealth of data is lacking for emerging, less intrusive modalities, such as ear-EEG. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The current study seeks to harness the abundance of open-source scalp EEG datasets by applying models pre-trained on data, either directly or with minimal fine-tuning; this is achieved in the context of effective sleep analysis from ear-EEG data that was recorded using a single in-ear electrode, referenced to the ipsilateral mastoid, and developed in-house as described in our previous work. Unlike previous studies, our research uniquely focuses on an older cohort (17 subjects aged 65-83, mean age 71.8 years, some with health conditions), and employs LightGBM for transfer learning, diverging from previous deep learning approaches.

resultsResults show that the initial accuracy of the pre-trained model on ear-EEG was 70.1%, but fine-tuning the model with ear-EEG data improved its classification accuracy to 73.7%. The fine-tuned model exhibited a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05, dependent t-test) for 10 out of the 13 participants, as reflected by an enhanced average Cohen's kappa score (a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement for categorical items) of 0.639, indicating a stronger agreement between automated and expert classifications of sleep stages. Comparative SHAP value analysis revealed a shift in feature importance for the N3 sleep stage, underscoring the effectiveness of the fine-tuning process.

conclusionOur findings underscore the potential of fine-tuning pre-trained scalp EEG models on ear-EEG data to enhance classification accuracy, particularly within an older population and using feature-based methods for transfer learning. This approach presents a promising avenue for ear-EEG analysis in sleep studies, offering new insights into the applicability of transfer learning across different populations and computational techniques. CLINICAL IMPACT: An enhanced ear-EEG method could be pivotal in remote monitoring settings, allowing for continuous, non-invasive sleep quality assessment in elderly patients with conditions like dementia or sleep apnea.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyScalpAgedAged, 80 and overEarFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePolysomnographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSleepAutomatic sleep scoringear-EEGhearablesmachine learningwearable EEG

Identifiers

PMID38765887
PMCPMC11100860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.