Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765858›Full record

ReviewBiomedical reports2024

Ultrasound‑guided erector spinae plane block in posterior lumbar surgery (Review).

Ke Deng, Kui Huang, Guo-Feng Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06801574 (EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE EFFECT OF THREE DIFFERENT ANALGESIC TECHNIQUES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LUMBAR FIXATION SURGERY USING SALIVARY OPIORPHIN LEVEL), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06801574 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of postoperative effect of three different analgesic techniques in patients undergoing lumbar fixation surgery using salivary opiorphin level: a prospective randomized clinical study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled84ConditionsLumbar Fixation SurgeryArmsErector Spinae Plane Block, infiltration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ke DengDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434300, P.R. China.
Kui HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434300, P.R. China.
Guo-Feng WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518052, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial planar block technique, which is used to reduce postoperative pain in several surgical procedures, including breast, thoracic, spine and hip surgery. Due to its recognizable anatomy and low complication rate, the application of ESPB has been significantly increased. However, it is rarely used in clinical practice for postoperative analgesia after posterior lumbar spine surgery, while the choice of adjuvant drugs, block levels and drug doses remain controversial. Based on the current literature review, ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine could be considered as the best available drug combination. The present review aimed to analyze the currently available clinical evidence and summarize the benefits and challenges of ESPB in spinal surgery, thus providing novel insights into the application of ESPB in the postoperative management of posterior lumbar surgery.

Indexed as

analgesiaESPBnerve blockposterior lumbar surgery

Identifiers

PMID38765858
PMCPMC11099891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.