Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765765›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2024

Application and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Early Screening of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at Primary Healthcare Institutions in China.

Xu Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xu YangDepartment of General Practice, Donghuashi Community Health Service Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-9856-2346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), as one of the major global health threat diseases, particularly in China, presents a high prevalence and mortality rate. Early diagnosis is crucial for controlling disease progression and improving patient prognosis. However, due to the lack of significant early symptoms, the awareness and diagnosis rates of COPD remain low. Against this background, primary healthcare institutions play a key role in identifying high-risk groups and early diagnosis. With the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, its potential in enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of COPD screening is evident. This paper discusses the characteristics of high-risk groups for COPD, current screening methods, and the application of AI technology in various aspects of screening. It also highlights challenges in AI application, such as data privacy, algorithm accuracy, and interpretability. Suggestions for improvement, such as enhancing AI technology dissemination, improving data quality, promoting interdisciplinary cooperation, and strengthening policy and financial support, aim to further enhance the effectiveness and prospects of AI technology in COPD screening at primary healthcare institutions in China.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly DiagnosisMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChinaDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansLungPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsartificial intelligencechronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedata privacyhigh-risk group screeningprimary healthcare institutions

Identifiers

PMID38765765
PMCPMC11102166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.