ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024
Tailored re-roofing technique for pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus dehiscence or diverticulum.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor re: Sathya A, Nguyen TN, Klein P, et al. Endovascular vs surgical treatment of sigmoid sinus diverticulum causing pulsatile tinnitus: A systematic review. Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar 22:15910199241231325.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Endovascular treatment of pulsatile tinnitus associated with venous sinus diverticulum: a scoping review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Tailored re-roofing technique for pulsatile tinnitus caused by sigmoid sinus dehiscence or diverticulum.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sigmoid sinus diverticulum/dehiscence (SSD) is one of the treatable causes of venous pulsatile tinnitus. It can be diagnosed using temporal bone computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance angiography/venography (MRA). In cases where patients find their symptoms intolerable, surgical treatment is typically preferred. Here, we have presented a novel surgical technique involving sigmoid sinus re-roofing and have analyzed its feasibility. Methods: Between January 2020 and July 2023, approximately 150 patients with pulsatile tinnitus were evaluated at two different tertiary hospitals. Of these, 12 patients were diagnosed with SSD, and seven underwent surgical treatment. Five patients were treated with tailored reroofing (TRR) of the sigmoid sinus and two with transmastoid resurfacing (MRS) of the sigmoid sinus. We compared the Korean tinnitus handicap inventory (K-THI) score, pure tone audiogram (PTA) threshold, and CT findings before and a month after surgeries for these two techniques. The operation time was also analyzed. Results: In TRR cases, the K-THI score reduced from 55.0 ± 31.4 preoperatively to 4.0 ± 3.0 postoperatively, and the SSD was well-repositioned and covered by a bone chip postoperatively. In MRS cases, the K-THI score reduced from 41.0 ± 9.9 preoperatively to 15.0 ± 21.2 postoperatively, and the SSD was well-covered with bone cement postoperatively. The average surgical time of five TRR and two MRS cases were 77.5 ± 32.5 and 174.0 ± 75.0 min, respectively. No complications were noted. Conclusions: Despite the insufficient number of cases, we noted that TRR requires a reasonable amount of time, involves a smaller incision, and may provide favorable outcomes compared to conventional MRS in cases of pulsatile tinnitus associated with SSD. Level of evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.